The Sandy Hook tragedy has led to much bickering, arguing, and a general opportunity for Americans to express their opinions. But a person has to ask themselves if the opinions they are expressing are "good-natured".
Every time a disaster falls, Americans feel the urgent need to enact new legislation. After 9/11 we were rushed into the Patriot Act, the Department of
Homeland Security, and the Iraq War. Now after the Sandy Hook tragedy
many states are passing gun control legislation (see link Gun Control Bills Flood Statehouses.., )
and there has been talk of a national ban on "military-style assault
rifles". Are we a people prone to panic? Why is it that it takes a
national tragedy to produce such an urgent need to enact change? When
is the last time that something good happened that put a fire into the
people?
Certainly there are special interests capitalizing on the events of the Sandy Hook tragedy as a means to enact push forward gun control legislation. It is difficult to deny that this also happened after 9/11. Of course there is not a lot of mention of the purpose of the 2nd amendment- the citizenry has a right to protect itself against an oppressive government. For this reason it is contrary to the notions of liberty to talk of banning "military-style assault rifles" for all but the military. Many of you who are reading recognize this truth.
I grew up in a small rural community, where there was constant talk of the government "taking away our guns". I recognize their sentiment and agree that the government should not take them away. That is not to say that we should have guns or use them, or more importantly, we need not be passionate about guns. "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also".
It does not appear that the federal government will be a leader in world peace. They are not going to give up using their weapons. The citizens of this country need to do that.
We should not ban assault weapons, we should just not use them. Jesus said, "Do not resist an evil person".
Great things can happen. Believe in those things.
Great things can happen. Believe in those things. If you believe you have something to say that expresses the will of God,
then you need to express it. This is not easy. In finding a way to
articulate a message in a way that people can understand and receive it
can be a painful process. It can take hard, hard work. But the more
you work, the easier it gets.
Showing posts with label procrastination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label procrastination. Show all posts
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Should We Be Blogging About Whether We Should Be Talking About Piers Morgan Bringing Alex Jones on Television
Labels:
assault rifles,
England,
fall,
Federalist,
free will,
george bush,
god,
gun control,
James Madison,
jesus,
kids,
parents,
procrastination,
rememberance,
sandy hook,
Tennessee,
the good,
the soul,
Thomas Jefferson
Friday, July 24, 2009
A List of Things That Need to Be Written
Treatise on God
Critique of John Locke (god-given rights) or whoever it was that was the main influence in the theory of laissez-faire capitalism in light of today's society. I could argue that hindsight shows that the author did not see the moral implications of the theory.
Critique of the U.s. Constitution and Declaration of Independence (god-given rights)- God gave us life, but he gave us no rights. Humans create rights for their fellow man. Rights such as life and liberty only exist when man agrees to not infringe upon another's life or liberty.
Don't critique the Declaration of Independence... Perhaps just write a critique on god-given rights.
A theoretical paper arguing for how peaceful diplomatic inteverntion could take place as opposed to military intervention in countries that are invading other countries (in response to one of the several arguments of why we couldn't remove all our military bases from around the world {the argument that we need to have military bases in order to protect countries from invaders}).
Critique of John Locke (god-given rights) or whoever it was that was the main influence in the theory of laissez-faire capitalism in light of today's society. I could argue that hindsight shows that the author did not see the moral implications of the theory.
Critique of the U.s. Constitution and Declaration of Independence (god-given rights)- God gave us life, but he gave us no rights. Humans create rights for their fellow man. Rights such as life and liberty only exist when man agrees to not infringe upon another's life or liberty.
Don't critique the Declaration of Independence... Perhaps just write a critique on god-given rights.
A theoretical paper arguing for how peaceful diplomatic inteverntion could take place as opposed to military intervention in countries that are invading other countries (in response to one of the several arguments of why we couldn't remove all our military bases from around the world {the argument that we need to have military bases in order to protect countries from invaders}).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)